Bhamaha

Bhamaha (Sanskrit: भामह, Bhāmaha) (c. 7th century[1]) was a Sanskrit poetician, apparently from Kashmir[2][3][4][5] believed to be contemporaneous with Daṇḍin. He is noted for writing a work called Kavyalankara (Sanskrit: काव्यालङ्कार, Kāvyālaṅkāra) ("The ornaments of poetry"). For centuries, he was known only by reputation, until manuscripts of the Kāvyālaṃkāra came to the attention of scholars in the early 1900s.[6]

Biography

Little is known of Bhāmaha's life: the last verse of the Kāvyālaṃkāra says that his father was called Rakrilagomin, but little more is known:[7]

Later Kashmiri writers often treat Bhāmaha as the founding father of Sanskrit poetics and, by the same token, make him stand for everything that is old school, a trend that must have begun with Udbhaṭa (c. 800) and his vast commentary on Bhāmaha’s work. This Kashmiri connection has led many to assume that Bhāmaha, too, hailed from the northern vale. But if this is the case, then, unlike many of his followers, whose patrons, positions, and, in some cases, salaries are referred to by Kalhaṇa, Bhāmaha does not receive any mention in the famous chronicle of Kashmir’s courts, the Rājataraṅgiṇī (River of Kings).[8]

Bhāmaha is rather seldom mentioned as a poet by later commentators, but seems to have had a significant reputation as a grammarian, being cited by the eighth-century Śāntarakṣita. The Bhāmaha who composed the Kāvyālaṃkāra might also be the same person as the one who composed a commentary on Vararuci’s Prākṛtaprakāáa, a Prakrit grammar, and a few other works have also been tentatively attributed to him.[9]

The Kāvyālaṃkāra has, however, been widely recognised as similar to and in many ways in disagreement with the Kāvyādarśa by Daṇḍin. Although modern scholars have debated which scholar was borrowing from which, or who was responding to whom, recent work suggests that Bhāmaha was the earlier scholar, and that Daṇḍin was responding to him. 'This would place Bhāmaha no later than the early 600s'.[10]

Kāvyālaṃkāra

Bhamaha's Kāvyālaṃkāra is divided into six paricchedas (chapters).[1] It comprises 398 verses, including two verses at the end of the sixth chapter, which briefly describe the number of verses on each of the five topics.[7] In the first verse, Bhamaha mentioned his work as Kavyalankara.[11]

The first chapter comprises 69 verses. After the invocation of Sarva, it defines kavya and describes the qualifications of a good poet. It also narrates various genres and styles of poems, which include Vaidarbhi and Gaudi.

In the beginning of the second chapter, three gunas of poems, namely prasada, madhurya and ojah are discussed.

It is followed by the discussion about the alankaras (figures of speech), which continues till the end of the third chapter.

The fourth chapter mentions about the eleven types of doshas (blemishes) of kavya and defines first ten of these doshas with illustrations.

The fifth chapter discusses the eleventh dosha and its causes. It is based on the Nyaya-Vaisheshika epistemology. The sixth chapter emphasizes the necessity of the grammatical accuracy and some practical hints to the poets are also provided.[7]

Editions

Commentaries

The only known pre-modern commentary on Kavyalankara is the 'learned and important'[12] Bhamahavivarana or Bhamahavritti by Udbhaṭa.[7][13] However, only a few fragments of this survive.[14]

External links

References

  1. 1 2 Shastri, Gaurinath (1998) [1943]. A Concise History of Classical Sanskrit Literature. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. p. 151. ISBN 81-208-0175-X.
  2. ↑ Richard Pischel, A Grammar of the Prakrit Languages, Motilal Banarsidass (1999), p. 43
  3. ↑ Satya Ranjan Banerjee, The Eastern School of Prakrit Grammarians: A Linguistic Study, Vidyasagar Pustak Mandir (1977), p. 31
  4. ↑ Kamaleswar Bhattacharya, India & Beyond, Routledge (2009), p. 2
  5. ↑ John E. Cort, Open Boundaries: Jain Communities and Cultures in Indian History, State University of New York Press (1998), p.57
  6. ↑ Yigal Bronner, 'A Question of Priority: Revisiting the Bhamaha-Daṇḍin Debate', The Journal of Indian Philosophy, 40 (2012), 67–118 (p. 68). DOI 10.1007/s10781-011-9128-x
  7. 1 2 3 4 Kane, P. V. (1998) [1971]. History of Sanskrit Poetics. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 78–88. ISBN 81-208-0274-8.
  8. ↑ Yigal Bronner, 'A Question of Priority: Revisiting the Bhamaha-Daṇḍin Debate', The Journal of Indian Philosophy, 40 (2012), 67–118 (p. 79). DOI 10.1007/s10781-011-9128-x
  9. ↑ Yigal Bronner, 'A Question of Priority: Revisiting the Bhamaha-Daṇḍin Debate', The Journal of Indian Philosophy, 40 (2012), 67–118 (pp. 79–80). DOI 10.1007/s10781-011-9128-x
  10. ↑ Yigal Bronner, 'A Question of Priority: Revisiting the Bhamaha-Daṇḍin Debate', The Journal of Indian Philosophy, 40 (2012), 67–118 (p. 110). DOI 10.1007/s10781-011-9128-x
  11. ↑ Biswas, A. R. (2005). Critique Of Poetics. Vol.II. New Delhi: Atlantic. p. 473. ISBN 81-269-0438-0.
  12. ↑ Yigal Bronner, 'A Question of Priority: Revisiting the Bhamaha-Daṇḍin Debate', The Journal of Indian Philosophy, 40 (2012), 67–118 (p. 79). DOI 10.1007/s10781-011-9128-x
  13. ↑ Sreekantaiya, T. N. (2001). Indian Poetics. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi. p. 22. ISBN 81-260-0807-5.
  14. ↑ Gnoli, R. (1962). Udbhaṭ’s commentary on the ‘‘Kāvyālaṃkāra’’ of Bhāmaha. Rome: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/1/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.