Buckinghamshire (UK Parliament constituency)
Buckinghamshire | |
---|---|
Former County constituency for the House of Commons | |
1265–1885 | |
Number of members | two |
Buckinghamshire is a former United Kingdom Parliamentary constituency. It was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1885.
Its most prominent member was Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli.
Boundaries and boundary changes
This county constituency consisted of the historic county of Buckinghamshire, in south-eastern England to the north-west of the modern Greater London region. Its southern boundary was the River Thames. See History of Buckinghamshire for maps of the historic county and details about it.
The county returned two knights of the shire until 1832 and three 1832-1885. The place of election for the county was at the county town of Aylesbury. Aylesbury replaced Buckingham as the county town in 1529.
The county, up to 1885, also contained the borough constituencies of Amersham (originally enfranchised with 2 seats from 1300, revived 1625, disenfranchised 1832), Aylesbury (originally enfranchised with 2 seats from 1302, revived 1554), Buckingham (2 seats from 1529, 1 seat from 1868), Chipping Wycombe (2 seats from 1300, 1 seat from 1868), Great Marlow (2 seats 1625-1868, 1 seat from 1868) and Wendover (2 seats 1625-1832, disenfranchised 1832).
In 1885 the county was split into three single-member county divisions. These were Aylesbury, Buckingham and Wycombe.
Aylesbury, Buckingham, Chipping Wycombe and Great Marlow were disenfranchised as borough constituencies. There were no remaining Parliamentary boroughs in the county from 1885.
Members of Parliament
Preliminary note: The English civil year started on 25 March until 1752 (Scotland having changed to 1 January in 1600). The year used in the lists of Parliaments in this article have been converted to the new style where necessary. It should be noted that old style dates would be a year earlier than the new style for days between 1 January and 24 March. No attempt has been made to compensate for the eleven days which did not occur in September 1752 in both England and Scotland as well as other British controlled territories (when the day after 2 September was 14 September), so as to bring the British Empire fully in line with the Gregorian calendar.
Constituency created (1265): See Simon de Montfort's Parliament for further details. Knights of the shire are known to have been summoned to most Parliaments from 1290 (19th Parliament of King Edward I of England) and to every one from 1320 (19th Parliament of King Edward II of England).
Knights of the shire 1290–1660
- For a list see Knights of Buckinghamshire
Knights of the shire 1660–1832
Knights of the shire 1832–1885
Election | First member | First party | Second member | Second party | Third member | Third party | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1832 | Marquess of Chandos | Conservative | John Smith | Liberal | Sir George Dashwood, 5th Bt. | Liberal | |||
1835 | Sir William Young, 4th Bt | Conservative | James Backwell Praed | Conservative | |||||
1837 by-election | George Simon Harcourt | Conservative | |||||||
1839 by-election | Caledon Du Pré | Conservative | |||||||
1841 | Charles Scott-Murray | Conservative | |||||||
1842 by-election | Hon. William FitzMaurice | Conservative | |||||||
1845 by-election | Christopher Tower | Conservative | |||||||
1847 | Hon. Charles Cavendish | Liberal | Benjamin Disraeli | Conservative | |||||
1857 | William Cavendish | Liberal | |||||||
1863 by-election | Robert Harvey | Conservative | |||||||
1868 | Nathaniel Grace Lambert | Liberal | |||||||
1874 | Sir Robert Harvey, Bt | Conservative | |||||||
1876 by-election | Hon. Thomas Fremantle | Conservative | |||||||
1880 | Rupert Carington | Liberal | |||||||
1885 | Constituency divided. See Aylesbury, Buckingham and Wycombe |
Elections
In multi-member elections the bloc voting system was used. Voters could cast a vote for one or two (or three in three-member elections 1832-1868) candidates, as they chose. The leading candidates with the largest number of votes were elected. In 1868 the limited vote was introduced, which restricted an individual elector to using one or two votes, in elections to fill three seats.
In by-elections, to fill a single seat, the first past the post system applied.
After 1832, when registration of voters was introduced, a turnout figure is given for contested elections. In three-member elections, when the exact number of participating voters is unknown, this is calculated by dividing the number of votes by three (to 1868) and two thereafter. To the extent that electors did not use all their votes this will be an underestimate of turnout.
Where a party had more than one candidate in one or both of a pair of successive elections change is calculated for each individual candidate, otherwise change is based on the party vote.
Candidates for whom no party has been identified are classified as Non Partisan. The candidate might have been associated with a party or faction in Parliament or consider himself to belong to a particular political tradition. Political parties before the 19th century were not as cohesive or organised as they later became. Contemporary commentators (even the reputed leaders of parties or factions) in the 18th century did not necessarily agree who the party supporters were. The traditional parties, which had arisen in the late 17th century, became increasingly irrelevant to politics in the 18th century (particularly after 1760), although for some contests in some constituencies party labels were still used. It was only towards the end of the century that party labels began to acquire some meaning again, although this process was by no means complete for several more generations.'
Sources: The results for elections 1660-1790 were taken from the History of Parliament Trust publications. The results are based on Stooks Smith from 1790 until the United Kingdom general election, 1832 and Craig from 1832. Where Stooks Smith gives additional information after 1832 this is indicated in a note.
1660-70s – 1680-90s – 1700-10s – 1720-30s – 1740-50s – 1760-70s – 1780-90s – 1800-10s – 1820-30s – 1840-50s – 1860-80s |
Elections in the 1660-70s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | William Bowyer | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Thomas Tyrrell | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Appointment of Tyrrell as a Judge
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | William Tyringham | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Sir William Bowyer, Bt | 1,499 | 27.58 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | William Tyringham | 1,379 | 25.37 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Richard Hampden | 1,315 | 24.20 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | R. Winwood | 1,242 | 22.85 | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | John Hampden | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Wharton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Elections in the 1680-90s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | John Hampden | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Wharton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Richard Hampden | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Wharton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Viscount Brackley | 2,430 | 44.66 | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Wharton | 1,804 | 33.16 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | T. Hackett | 1,207 | 22.18 | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Sir Thomas Lee, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Wharton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Richard Hampden | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Wharton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Sir Richard Atkins, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Wharton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Succession of Wharton as 5th Baron Wharton
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Hon. William Cheyne | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory gain from Whig | Swing | N/A | |||
- Note (February 1696): The Hon. William Cheyne succeeded his father as the 2nd Viscount Newhaven, an Irish peerage, in 1698.
- Death of Atkins
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Henry Neale | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | The Viscount Newhaven | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Goodwin Wharton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Elections in the 1700-10s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | The Viscount Newhaven | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Goodwin Wharton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Robert Dormer | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Goodwin Wharton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | The Viscount Newhaven | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Goodwin Wharton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Death of Wharton
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Sir Richard Temple, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig gain from Non Partisan | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Robert Dormer | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Sir Richard Temple, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Appointment of Dormer as a Justice of the Court of Common Pleas
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Hon. William Egerton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Sir Edmund Denton, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Richard Hampden | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Note (1708): Possible classification - Hampden (W)
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Sir Edmund Denton, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | The Viscount Fermanagh | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | The Viscount Fermanagh | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | John Fleetwood | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Note (1713): Possible classification - Fleetwood (T)
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | John Fleetwood | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Richard Hampden | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Note (1715): Possible classification - Fleetwood (T), Hampden (W)
- Appointment of Hampden as a Teller of the Exchequer
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Richard Hampden | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Note (1716): Possible classification - Hampden (W)
- Appointment of Hampden as Treasurer of the Navy
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Richard Hampden | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Note (1717): Possible classification - Hampden (W)
Elections in the 1720-30s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Montague Garrard Drake | 2,441 | 37.21 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Sir Thomas Lee, Bt | 2,415 | 36.81 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Fleetwood Dormer | 1,704 | 25.98 | N/A | |
- Note (1722): Possible classification - Drake (T), Lee & Dormer (W)
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Hon. Sir William Stanhope | 2,310 | 39.39 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Richard Hampden | 1,903 | 32.45 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | William Gore | 1,651 | 28.16 | N/A | |
- Note (1727): Possible classification - Stanhope & Hampden (W), Gore (T)
- Death of Hampden
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Sir Thomas Lee, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Note (1729): Possible classification - Lee (W)
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Hon. Sir William Stanhope | 2,414 | 43.96 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Sir Thomas Lee, Bt | 1,763 | 32.11 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Richard Lowndes | 1,314 | 23.93 | N/A | |
- Note (1734): Possible classification - Stanhope & Lee (W), Lowndes (T)
Elections in the 1740-50s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Richard Grenville | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Richard Lowndes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Note (1741): Possible classification - Lowndes (T)
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Richard Lowndes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Hon. Sir William Stanhope | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Note (1747): Possible classification - Lowndes (T), Stanhope (W)
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Richard Lowndes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Hon. Sir William Stanhope | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Note (1754): Possible classification - Lowndes (T), Stanhope (W)
Elections in the 1760-70s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Richard Lowndes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Hon. Sir William Stanhope | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Note (1761): Possible classification - Lowndes (T), Stanhope (W)
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Richard Lowndes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | The Earl Verney | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Note (1768): Possible classification - Lowndes (T)
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | George Grenville | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | The Earl Verney | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Succession of Grenville as 3rd Earl Temple
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hon. Thomas Grenville | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections in the 1780-90s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hon. Thomas Grenville | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | The Earl Verney | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Grenville | 2,261 | 39.55 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | John Aubrey | 1,740 | 30.44 | N/A | |
Whig | The Earl Verney | 1,716 | 30.02 | N/A | |
- Note (1784): Poll 13 days. 3,548 voted. Possible classification for Aubrey (T). (Source: Stooks Smith)
- An alternative interpretation is that Aubrey was a supporter of Pitt (who called himself a Whig, although retrospectively usually classified as a Tory). Aubrey had very clearly identified himself with the opposition to the Fox-North coalition. (Source: Davis)
- Appointment of Grenville as Secretary of State for the Home Department
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Grenville | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Marquess of Titchfield | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | The Earl Verney | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Death of Verney
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Rt Hon. James Grenville | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan gain from Whig | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Rt Hon. James Grenville | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Marquess of Titchfield | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Resignation of Grenville
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Earl Temple | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections in the 1800-10s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Earl Temple | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Marquess of Titchfield | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Note (1802): Identifying a definitive party label for Temple and Titchfield is difficult. Stooks Smith considered Temple a Tory and Titchfield a Whig, but he may not be reliable for Bucks candidates allegiances before about 1818. Both knights of the shire were members of traditional Whig families and were closely related to one or more Whig Prime Ministers. Temple was a member of the Grenville family, which had supported their cousin William Pitt the Younger during his first premiership 1783-1801. Former Bucks MP (and uncle of Earl Temple) William Wyndham Grenville, 1st Baron Grenville had become closer to Charles James Fox and his faction of opposition Whigs since leaving office with Pitt in 1801. This may have affected the political position of his relatives like Earl Temple. Titchfield was the son of William Cavendish-Bentinck, 3rd Duke of Portland who had been the Whig Prime Minister of the Fox-North Coalition, in office before Pitt. However Portland had split his Whig faction and broken with the pre-eminent opposition Whig leader in the House of Commons, Charles James Fox, over the attitude to be taken to the French Revolution. Portland joined Pitt's cabinet in 1794. Pitt called himself a Whig, although his followers came from both traditional Whig and Tory families. Titchfield, when he was first elected for the county in 1791, had been brought forward as a candidate by the Buckinghamshire Independent Club. This club had supported the late Earl Verney, and were definitely a Whig organisation. At that time Titchfield's father was the leader of the largest Whig faction in opposition to Pitt's Ministry. However Davis does imply that Titchfield himself was a Tory, which is how he has been classified in this article. In the absence of a clear indication of whether Temple considered himself a Whig or Tory at this stage of his career, he has been classified as a Non Partisan member for this article.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Earl Temple | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Marquess of Titchfield | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Note (1806): As for 1802 save that following Pitt's death William Wyndham Grenville, 1st Baron Grenville, who had not joined Pitt's second Ministry in 1804, become Prime Minister of the Ministry of All the Talents in 1806. This may have led the Grenvilles, in retrospect, to continue to be regarded as Whig when Pitt and other groups of his supporters came to be called Tory after Pitt's death.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Rt Hon. Earl Temple | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Marquess of Titchfield | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Note (1807): As before save that in 1807 the Duke of Portland had formed a Tory administration (although he claimed to be the Whig Prime Minister of a Tory Ministry). In retrospect Portland has been regarded as a Tory at the time of his second Ministry.
- Succession of Titchfield as 4th Duke of Portland
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | William Selby Lowndes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan gain from Tory | Swing | N/A | |||
- Note (1810): Possible party for Selby Lowndes is Whig (source: Stooks Smith), but given his conservative religious views and support for Henry Addington, 1st Viscount Sidmouth's anti-dissenter policy it may be best to regard him as a member of a traditional Whig family who was moving towards being a nineteenth century Tory. He has been classified as Non Partisan for the purpose of this article.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | William Selby Lowndes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Rt Hon. Earl Temple | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Succession of Temple as 2nd Marquess of Buckingham
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Thomas Grenville | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Note (1813): Grenville was the uncle of the 2nd Marquess of Buckingham (formerly Earl Temple MP). The same factors noted for Temple lead to Thomas Grenville being classified as Non Partisan for the purpose of this article. Stooks Smith however classifies him as Tory and he was of the same generation as his brother William Wyndham Grenville, 1st Baron Grenville classified by Stooks Smith as a Tory and in this article as a Whig.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | William Selby Lowndes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Earl Temple | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Elections in the 1820-30s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hon. Robert Smith | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Earl Temple | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- From 1822 Temple was known by the courtesy title of Marquess of Chandos, as his father was created 1st Duke of Buckingham and Chandos
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Marquess of Chandos | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Robert Smith | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Marquess of Chandos | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Robert Smith | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Marquess of Chandos | 1,594 | 42.18 | N/A | |
Whig | John Smith | 1,284 | 33.98 | N/A | |
Whig | Pascoe Grenfell | 901 | 23.84 | N/A | |
- Note (1831): Chandos 1,287 plumpers, 287 split with Smith, 18 split with Grenfell; Smith 191 plumpers, 806 split with Grenfell; Grenfell 2 plumpers. Total voters 2,593. (Source: Davis). Poll: 4 days. (Source: Stooks Smith)
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Marquess of Chandos | 2,856 | 33.84 | -8.34 | |
Liberal | John Smith | 2,402 | 28.46 | -5.52 | |
Liberal | George Henry Dashwood | 1,647 | 19.51 | +19.51 | |
Conservative | Charles Robert Scott Murray | 1,536 | 18.20 | +18.20 | |
Turnout | 5,306 | 78.95 | N/A | ||
- Note (1832): 5,306 registered electors; 4,189 voted (Source: Stooks Smith).
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Marquess of Chandos | 3,094 | 28.91 | -4.93 | |
Conservative | Sir William Laurence Young, Bt | 2,394 | 22.37 | +22.37 | |
Conservative | James Backwell Praed | 2,179 | 20.36 | +20.36 | |
Liberal | George Henry Dashwood | 1,672 | 15.62 | -3.89 | |
Liberal | Dr John Lee | 1,365 | 12.75 | +12.75 | |
Turnout | 5,371 | 73.47 | -5.48 | ||
- Note (1835): 5,371 registered electors; 3,946 voted (Source: Stooks Smith).
- Death of Praed
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | George Simon Harcourt | 2,233 | 69.46 | +69.46 | |
Liberal | George Henry Dashwood | 982 | 30.54 | +14.92 | |
Majority | 1,251 | 38.91 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 5,760 | 55.82 | -17.65 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Marquess of Chandos | 2,993 | 28.78 | +28.78 | |
Conservative | George Simon Harcourt | 2,704 | 26.00 | -43.46 | |
Conservative | Sir William Laurence Young, Bt | 2,633 | 25.32 | +25.32 | |
Liberal | George Robert Smith | 2,071 | 19.91 | +19.91 | |
Turnout | 5,760 | 77.50 | +21.68 | ||
- Note (1837): 5,761 registered electors; 4,464 voted (Source: Stooks Smith). Turnout calculated on Craig's electorate figure of 5,760.
- Succession of Chandos as 2nd Duke of Buckingham and Chandos
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Caledon Du Pré | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections in the 1840-50s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir William Laurence Young, Bt | 2,578 | 29.83 | N/A | |
Conservative | Caledon Du Pré | 2,572 | 29.76 | N/A | |
Conservative | Charles Robert Scott Murray | 2,547 | 29.47 | N/A | |
Liberal | Dr John Lee | 495 | 5.73 | N/A | |
Liberal | Henry Morgan Vane | 450 | 5.21 | N/A | |
Turnout | 6,156 | 49.89 | N/A | ||
- Note (1841): 6,107 registered electors; 3,071 voted (Source: Stooks Smith). Turnout calculated on Craig's electorate figure of 6,156.
- Death of Young
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Hon. William Edward Fitzmaurice | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Resignation of Scott Murray
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Christopher Tower | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Hon. Charles Compton Cavendish | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Benjamin Disraeli | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Caledon Du Pré | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Appointment of Disraeli as Chancellor of the Exchequer
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Benjamin Disraeli | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Caledon Du Pré | 2,000 | 33.16 | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Benjamin Disraeli | 1,973 | 32.71 | N/A | |
Liberal | Hon. Charles Compton Cavendish | 1,403 | 23.26 | N/A | |
Liberal | Dr John Lee | 656 | 10.88 | N/A | |
Turnout | 5,659 | 35.53 | N/A | ||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Hon. Charles Compton Cavendish | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Benjamin Disraeli | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Caledon Du Pré | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Creation of Cavendish as 1st Baron Chesham
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Hon. William George Cavendish | 1,617 | 52.65 | N/A | |
Conservative | Charles John Baillie-Hamilton | 1,454 | 47.35 | N/A | |
Majority | 163 | 5.31 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 5,353 | 57.37 | N/A | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Appointment of Disraeli as Chancellor of the Exchequer
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Benjamin Disraeli | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Hon. William George Cavendish | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Benjamin Disraeli | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Caledon Du Pré | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Elections in the 1860-80s
- Succession of Cavendish as 2nd Baron Chesham
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Bateson Harvey | 2,311 | 88.07 | N/A | |
Liberal | Dr John Lee | 313 | 11.93 | N/A | |
Majority | 1,998 | 76.14 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 5,836 | 44.96 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Benjamin Disraeli | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Caledon Du Pré | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Robert Bateson Harvey | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Appointment of Disraeli as Chancellor of the Exchequer
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Benjamin Disraeli | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Benjamin Disraeli | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Caledon Du Pré | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Liberal | Nathaniel Grace Lambert | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Benjamin Disraeli | 2,999 | 38.59 | N/A | |
Conservative | Sir Robert Bateson Harvey, Bt | 2,902 | 37.34 | N/A | |
Liberal | Nathaniel Grace Lambert | 1,720 | 22.13 | N/A | |
Conservative | W. Talley | 151 | 1.94 | N/A | |
Turnout | 7,368 | 52.74 | N/A | ||
- Talley was a Slough solicitor who contested the seat as a "Progressive Conservative". (Source: Davis)
- Appointment of Disraeli as Prime Minister and First Lord of the Treasury
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Benjamin Disraeli | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Creation of Disraeli as 1st Earl of Beaconsfield
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Hon. Thomas Fremantle | 2,725 | 51.77 | N/A | |
Liberal | Hon. Rupert Carington | 2,539 | 48.23 | N/A | |
Majority | 186 | 3.53 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 7,273 | 72.38 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir Robert Bateson Harvey, Bt | 2,956 | 31.68 | +31.68 | |
Liberal | Hon. Rupert Carington | 2,790 | 29.90 | -18.33 | |
Conservative | Hon. Thomas Fremantle | 2,790 | 29.90 | -21.87 | |
Conservative | Frederick Charsley | 796 | 8.53 | +8.53 | |
Turnout | 8,114 | 57.51 | -14.87 | ||
- Constituency divided in the 1885 redistribution
See also
- List of former United Kingdom Parliamentary constituencies
- Unreformed House of Commons
- List of Parliaments of England
References
- The History and Antiquities of Buckinghamshire, Vol. 1, by George Lipscomb (1847)
- The House of Commons 1754-1790, by Sir Lewis Namier and John Brooke (HMSO 1964)
- Political Change and Continuity 1760-1885: A Buckinghamshire Study, by Richard W. Davis (David & Charles 1972)
- The Parliaments of England by Henry Stooks Smith (1st edition published in three volumes 1844-50), second edition edited (in one volume) by F. W. S. Craig (Political Reference Publications 1973)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament: Volume I 1832-1885, edited by M. Stenton (The Harvester Press 1976)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885, compiled and edited by F. W. S. Craig (The Macmillan Press 1977)
- Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "B" (part 6)
Parliament of the United Kingdom | ||
---|---|---|
Preceded by Vacant. Last was Tiverton in 1865 |
Constituency represented by the Prime Minister 27 February 1868 – 1 December 1868 |
Succeeded by Greenwich |
Preceded by Greenwich |
Constituency represented by the Prime Minister 1874–1876 |
Succeeded by Vacant. Next was Midlothian in 1880 |