Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States
Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued February 22, 2016 Decided June 16, 2016 | |||||||
Full case name | Kingdomware Technologies, Inc., Petitioner v. United States | ||||||
Docket nos. | 14–916 | ||||||
Citations | |||||||
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
The Department of Veterans Affairs must apply the "Rule of Two" when considering and awarding contracts under the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006. The rule is mandatory, not discretionary, regardless of whether the rule is being used to meet annual minimum contracting goals. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Thomas, joined by unanimous | ||||||
Laws applied | |||||||
Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 |
Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Department of Veterans Affairs must apply the "Rule of Two" when considering and awarding contracts under the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006. The rule is mandatory, not discretionary, regardless of whether the rule is being used to meet annual minimum contracting goals.[1][2]
Opinion of the Court
Associate Justice Clarence Thomas authored a unanimous opinion.[2]
References
- ↑ SCOTUSblog coverage
- 1 2 Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States, No. 14–916, 579 U.S. ____ (2016).
External links
- Slip opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court
- SCOTUSblog coverage
- Oyez.org coverage
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 8/12/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.