Law on the fight against terrorism

Law on the fight against terrorism
Loi relative à la lutte contre le terrorisme
French Parliament
Loi n° 2006-64 du 23 janvier 2006 relative à la lutte contre le terrorisme et portant dispositions diverses relatives à la sécurité et aux contrôles frontaliers
Citation Law No. 2006-64
Territorial extent France and Overseas departments and territories of France
Enacted by National Assembly
Date enacted 15 December 2005
Enacted by Senate
Date enacted 22 December 2005
Signed by Jacques Chirac
Introduced by Nicolas Sarkozy
First reading 28 October 2005
Conference committee bill passed 19 January 2006
Keywords
counter-terrorism, national security
Status: Substantially amended

The Law on the fight against terrorism (French: Loi relative à la lutte contre le terrorisme), abbreviated LCT, is a 2006 French counter-terrorism legislation designed to improve state security and strengthen border control. The legislation was passed on 23 January 2006 under the leadership of Nicolas Sarkozy, then the Minister of the Interior. Notably the law increased punitive measures for criminal association and gave the government more power to access personal information online.[1]

Background

After the 2005 London bombings perpetrated by Islamic extremists, Sarkozy pushed to strengthen counter-terrorism measures in France.[1] Sarkozy introduced the bill in the French Senate on 28 October 2005, saying that while France had never yielded to terrorist intimidation and never would, the rise in global terrorism necessitated change in policy.[2]

Legislation

The legislation amended several previous criminal codes, including the first French counter-terrorism law, introduced in 1986. The 2006 act particularly increased the breadth of government surveillance without judicial control.[3][1][4]

Criticisms

The law was criticized for encroaching on personal freedoms and liberties, in particular, accessing phone and Internet data without a signed warrant from a judicial authority. "Internet surveillance has now escaped from any legal proceedings to be placed under the direct control of the state," criticized Le Monde.[5]

See also

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 8/27/2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.