List of failed and overbudget custom software projects

This is a list of notable custom software projects which have significantly failed to achieve some or all of their objectives, either temporarily or permanently, and/or have suffered from significant cost overruns. For a list of successful major custom software projects, see Custom software#Major project successes.

Note that failed projects, and projects running over budget, are not necessarily the sole fault of the employees or businesses creating the software. In some cases, problems may be due partly to problems with the purchasing organisation, including poor requirements, over-ambitious requirements, unnecessary requirements, poor contract drafting, poor contract management, poor end-user training, or poor operational management.

Permanent failures

Because software, unlike a major civil engineering construction project, is often easy and cheap to change after it has been constructed, a piece of custom software that fails to deliver on its objectives may sometimes be modified over time in such a way that it later succeeds - and/or business processes or end-user mindsets may change to accommodate the software. However, sometimes, for various reasons, neither approach succeeds (or is even tried), and this may be considered as another level of failure - a permanent failure.

Started	Terminated	System name	Type of system	Country or region	Type of purchaser	Problems	Cost (expected)	Outsourced or in-house?	Outcome
1980s	1993	TAURUS	Electronic trading platform	United Kingdom (London)	Stock exchange	Scope creep, cost overrun. The project was never completed.	£75m	?	Cancelled
1984	1990	RISP	Integrated computer services	United Kingdom (Wessex)	Wessex Health Authority	Scope creep, cost overrun. The project was never completed.	£63m (£29m)	?	Cancelled
1997	2000	Bolit	Customer service, finance and administration system	Sweden	Patent and Registration Office	Too complicated, bad functioning, cost overrun. The project was after completion never used, the agency still today does not have a working IT system.[1][2]	SEK 300m ($35m)	Outsourced	Scrapped
2002	2011	NHS Connecting for Health	Electronic care records	United Kingdom	Central government	Beset by delays and ballooning costs, and the software part of it was never finished. The government was also criticised for not demonstrating value for money. Although the contracts were drafted to ensure that the contractors would be forced to bear a significant portion of the cost of the project going wrong if it did go wrong, in reality this did not always happen. The NPfIT was described by Members of Parliament as one of the "worst and most expensive contracting fiascos" ever.[3]	£12bn (£2.3bn)	Outsourced	Discontinued, but some parts continued
2005	2012	Expeditionary Combat Support System	Military Enterprise Resource Planning	United States	Air force	No significant capabilities ready on time; would have cost $1.1bn more just to get to 1/4 of the original scope.	$1.1bn	Outsourced - including requirements	Cancelled
2007	2012	da:Polsag	Police case management	Denmark	Police	Did not work properly, technical problems with contractor.	DKK 500m ($70m)	Outsourced	Cancelled
2007	2014	e-Borders	Advanced passenger information programme	United Kingdom	UK Border Agency	A series of delays.	over £412m (£742m)	Outsourced	Cancelled
2007	2010	Försäkringskassan SAP	Dental health service system	Sweden	Social Insurance Agency	Not fit for purpose, multiple delays, cost overrun.	SEK 10bn ($1.18bn)[4]	Outsourced, then insourced	Cancelled[5]
2008	2013	Digital Media Initiative	Digital production, media asset management	United Kingdom	State broadcaster	By 2013, the project was judged to be obsolete (as much cheaper commercial off the shelf alternatives by then existed) and was scrapped by BBC management. The BBC Director General said it had been a huge waste of money.[6]	more than £98m (£81.7m)	Outsourced, then insourced, then outsourced again	Cancelled
2009	2013	The Surrey Integrated Reporting Enterprise Network (SIREN)	Crime & criminal intelligence logging system	United Kingdom (Surrey)	Police Force	Not fit for purpose[7]	£14.8m	Outsourced	Scrapped
2011	2014	Pust Siebel	Police case management	Sweden	Police	Poor functioning, inefficient in work environments.[8]	SEK 300m ($35m)[9]	Outsourced	Scrapped
2012	2014	Cover Oregon	Healthcare exchange website	United States	State government	Site was never able to accept online enrollments, so users were instructed to mail in paper enrollments instead.	approx $200m	Outsourced	Cancelled, then client and supplier both sued each other

Temporary issues and mere budget overruns

Started	System name	Type of system	Country or region	Type of purchaser	Problems	Cost (expected)	Outsourced or in-house?
1992	LASCAD	Computer-aided dispatch for emergency ambulances	United Kingdom (London)	Central government	Ambulance delays and other problems were caused by the introduction of the system. The Chief of the London Ambulance Service resigned as a result of the problems and the adverse publicity.	£1.5m	Outsourced
2013	HealthCare.gov	Healthcare exchange website[10]	United States	Federal government	By some estimates, only 1% of people managed to successfully enroll with the site in its first week of operation.[10] On October 20, 2013, President Barack Obama remarked, "There's no sugar coating: the website has been too slow, people have been getting stuck during the application process and I think it's fair to say that nobody's more frustrated by that than I am."	$1.5bn ($93.7m)	Outsourced

Projects with ongoing problems

Until the significant problems with these projects are resolved, or the projects cancelled, it is not yet possible to classify them into one of the above categories.

Started	System name	Type of system	Country or region	Type of purchaser	Problems	Cost (expected)	Outsourced or in-house?
2007	PRIO	Logistic and financial system	Sweden	Armed Forces	Parts of the system was put into use in 2009, with reports of big usability issues following.[11] In 2012 troubles with supply of spare parts was reported, causing multiple Gripen fighter jets to be put out of service. The air force was operating at a 70% capacity, another area was reported to operate at a 3% capacity with half of the staff not able to work at all. It would take up to a year to restore capacity.[12][13] At this point the cost to scrap the project and develop a new one was estimated to be SEK 11bn ($1.3bn). Not seen as an alternative, the development continued and the original budget of SEK 2.4bn was increased to 4bn.[14] In 2015 the project was still on its way to be fully implemented.	SEK 4bn ($470m)[15] (ongoing)	Technical aspects outsourced
2013	Universal Credit	Welfare payments system consolidation	United Kingdom	Central government	The schedule has slipped. Only one of four planned pilots went ahead according to the original schedule, and this pilot was restricted to extremely simple cases. There were reports that all the benefit calculations had to be done manually in spreadsheets, which implied that only the digital forms part of the system was working correctly. A maximum of 25,000 people – just 0.2% of all benefit recipients – will be transferred onto Universal Credit by the next general election in 2015[16]	£12.8bn (estimated) (£2.2bn)[17]	Outsourced
2010	Standard Business Reporting (Australian Taxation Office)	Electronic Reporting to Government	Australia	Statutory authority	6 years after program started in 2010, approximately $800m to $1bn has been spent in total. A significant portion of this spend was composed of contracting fees to IBM[18] and Fujitsu.[19] As of early 2016, business take up of electronic reporting was 2-3%. Program has also suffered from significant scope creep[20] and confused objectives.[21] It is likely that choice of XBRL as the reporting format is the main driver behind low take-up (due to its obscurity and high implementation cost [22][23][24] relative to other technical standards).	~$1bn to date (ongoing)	Technical aspects outsourced

See also

• Software crisis
• Vaporware
• Agile software development
• Government waste

References

1. "Regeringens proposition 2003/04:34". Government of Sweden. 6 November 2003. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
2. "Därför floppade projekten: Tre svenska it-fiaskon under lupp". IDG. 11 June 2010. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
3. "NHS IT system one of 'worst fiascos ever', say MPs". BBC News. 18 September 2013. Retrieved 29 September 2013.
4. "Tio miljarder för SAP på Försäkringskassan". Computer Sweden. 12 September 2008. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
5. "SAP-stopp på Försäkringskassan". Computer Sweden. 29 January 2009. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
6. "BBC abandons £100m digital project". BBC News. 24 May 2013. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
7. "Siren police IT project's £15m failure a 'debacle'". BBC News. 19 June 2014. Retrieved 14 November 2014.
8. "Polisen lägger ner Pust". DN. 20 February 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2016.
9. "Intern rapport dömer ut Polisens it-system". Computer Sweden. 27 May 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2016.
10. Paul Ford (16 October 2013). "The Obamacare Website Didn't Have to Fail. How to Do Better Next Time". Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
11. "Hård kritik från Statskontoret". SvD. 12 July 2009. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
12. "Datorstrul förlamar försvaret". SR. 17 April 2012. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
13. "Många Jas-plan kan fortfarande inte lyfta". Norrbottens-Kuriren. 12 June 2012. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
14. "Försvarets SAP-strul toppen av ett isberg". Computer Sweden. 2 November 2014. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
15. "Granskning av Försvarsmaktens införande av ett integrerat resurs- och ekonomiledningssystem (PRIO)" (PDF). Statskontoret. June 2010. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
16. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/oct/31/universal
17. Mark Ballard (3 June 2013). "Universal Credit will cost taxpayers £12.8bn". Computer Weekly. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
18. https://www.tenders.gov.au/?event=public.advancedsearch.CNSONRedirect&type=cnEvent&atmType=archived%2Cclosed%2Cpublished%2Cproposed&agencyUUID=0ECB54CA-EE15-8B26-3C430607E8DB3D4E%2C0ECB25C0-02C3-6BAA-4738951514F489A9&agencyStatus=0%2C0%2C0&portfolioUUID=&keyword=&KeywordTypeSearch=AllWord&CNID=&dateType=Publish+Date&dateStart=&dateEnd=&supplierName=IBM&supplierABN=&valueFrom=&valueTo=&ATMID=&AgencyRefId=&category=&consultancy=&submit=Search
19. https://www.tenders.gov.au/?event=public.advancedsearch.CNSONRedirect&type=cnEvent&atmType=archived%2Cclosed%2Cpublished%2Cproposed&agencyUUID=0ECB54CA-EE15-8B26-3C430607E8DB3D4E%2C0ECB25C0-02C3-6BAA-4738951514F489A9&agencyStatus=0%2C0%2C0&portfolioUUID=&keyword=&KeywordTypeSearch=AllWord&CNID=&dateType=Publish+Date&dateStart=&dateEnd=&supplierName=Fujitsu&supplierABN=&valueFrom=&valueTo=&ATMID=&AgencyRefId=&category=&consultancy=&submit=Search
20. http://www.sbr.gov.au/about-sbr/news-listing/may-2015/-xbrl-as-the-sbr-standard-for-financial-and-superstream-transactions
21. http://budget.gov.au/2015-16/content/myefo/html/10_appendix_a_revenue.htm - see 'Single Touch Payroll' measure
22. http://www.ifrs.org/Meetings/MeetingDocs/XBRL/2013/XAC/3b)%20FERF%20survey.pdf
23. http://blogs.wsj.com/cfo/2013/01/22/costly-data-go-untapped/
24. https://www.business.uq.edu.au/momentum/telling-it-it-standard-business-reporting

External links

• The Risks Digest
• "Risk Factor - IEEE Spectrum". spectrum.ieee.org. 2015. Retrieved June 16, 2015.
• Best Practices and Measures for Success of your ERP IT Software Projects