Photon underproduction crisis

The photon underproduction crisis was a cosmological deficit between observed photons and predicted photons.[1][2]

The deficit, or underproduction crisis, arises from comparing observations of ultraviolet light emitted from known populations of galaxies and quasars to theoretical predictions of the amount of ultraviolet light require to simulate the observed distribution of the hydrogen gas in the local universe in a cosmological simulation. The distribution of hydrogen gas was inferred using Lyman-alpha forest observations from Hubble Space Telescope’s Cosmic Origins Spectrograph.[3] The amount of light from galaxies and quasars can be estimated from its effect on the distribution of hydrogen and helium in the regions between galaxies. Highly energetic ultraviolet photons can convert electrically neutral hydrogen gas into ionized gas. A team led by Juna Kollmeier reported an unexpected deficit of roughly 400% between ionizing light from known sources and the actual observations of intergalactic hydrogen. Kollmeier and her team wrote in their scientific report, “We examine the statistics of the low-redshift Lyman-alpha forest from smoothed particle hydrodynamic simulations in light of recent improvements in the estimated evolution of the cosmic ultraviolet background (UVB) and recent observations from the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS). We find that the value of the metagalactic photoionization rate required by our simulations to match the observed properties of the low-redshift Lyman-alpha forest is a factor of 5 larger than the value predicted by state-of-the art models for the evolution of this quantity.”[4] Cosmological simulations start at very high cosmological redshift z (such as z=100 or larger) and are evolved to z=0. According to Benjamin D. Oppenheimer, who is one of the report's coauthors, “The simulations fit the data beautifully in the early universe, and they fit the local data beautifully if we’re allowed to assume that this extra light is really there. It's possible the simulations do not reflect reality, which by itself would be a surprise, because intergalactic hydrogen is the component of the Universe that we think we understand the best.”[1] Kollmeier and her team state that "... either conventional sources of ionizing photons (galaxies and quasars) must contribute considerably more than current observational estimates or our theoretical understanding of the low-redshift universe is in need of substantial revision.”[4] Similar study, led by Michael Shull, found that the deficit is only factor 2 large and not a factor 5 as previously claimed.[5]

The photon underproduction crisis is resolved by a series of recent papers. Khaire & Srianand [6] showed that a factor 2 to 5 times large metagalactic photoionization rate can be easily obtained using updated quasar and galaxy observations. Recent observations of quasars indicate that the quasar contribution to ultraviolet photons is factor 2 large as compared to previous estimates. The revised galaxy contribution is also factor 3 higher. Furthermore, the Kollmeier GADGET-2 simulations did not include heating from AGN feedback. Including AGN feedback was shown to be an important element for heating in the low redshift IGM (Gurvich, Burkhart, & Bird 2016.[7]). This implies that the low redshift COS data can be used to calibrate AGN feedback models in cosmological simulations.

References

  1. 1 2 "Cosmic accounting reveals missing light crisis". Carnegie Institution for Science, News. July 8, 2014.
  2. ↑ Temming, Maria (July 16, 2014). "The Mystery of the Missing Light". Sky & Telescope.
  3. ↑ Danforth et. al, "on arXiv", Submitted to ApJ,
  4. 1 2 Kollmeier, Juna; Weinberg, David H.; Oppenheimer, Benjamin D.; Haardt, Francesco; et al. (2014). "The Photon Underproduction Crisis". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 798 (2): L32. arXiv:1404.2933Freely accessible. Bibcode:2014ApJ...789L..32K. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/789/2/L32.
  5. ↑ Shull, Moloney, Danforth, Tilton 2015 , Astrophysical Journal,
  6. ↑ Khaire & Srianand 2015, , MNRAS Letters,
  7. ↑ https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03293
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/20/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.