Sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs

Sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs refers to the different physical characteristics of male and female dinosaurs of the same species. This means that the male and female dinosaurs of a species may differ in size, color, shape, or they may even look like a completely different species altogether, such as in the case of the anglerfish. These differing physical characteristics can also be the deciding factor for choosing a mate or can be helpful for blending into the surrounding environment. Researching sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs can be extremely difficult because suitable tissue and skeletal samples are required for testing, and most fossils and other samples have been damaged by decomposition and fossilization.

Concept

Sexual dimorphism refers to the phenotypic variations between male and female members of species. Examples include differences in morphology, size, ornamentation and behaviour. Sexual dimorphism, a by-product of sexual selection, is prominent across all categories of living organisms. For instance, peacocks display vibrant plumage colours in an attempt to attract and copulate with their female counterpart, the peahen. This form of temptation is defined as intersexual selection, the process in which female or male specimens choose among potential mates.[1] However, some groups of species acquire a mate by the means of competitively engaging in an aggressive confrontation among others, whereby the victor is entitled to its significant other, a concept coined as intrasexual selection.[1]

Sexual dimorphism and dinosaurs

Examining fossils of dinosaurs in search of sexually dimorphic characteristics requires the supply of complete and articulated skeletal and tissue remains.[2] As terrestrial organisms, dinosaur carcasses are subject to ecological and geographical influence that inevitably constitutes the degree of preservation. The availability of well-preserved remains is not a probable outcome as a consequence of decomposition and fossilization. Some paleontologists have looked for sexual dimorphism among dinosaurs using statistics and comparison to ecologically or phylogenetically related modern animals.

Examples of sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs

The following are summarized academic researches conducted by palaeontologists, Roy Chapman and Paul Penkalski. Although these studies aren't conclusive in providing factual information, they do provide an insightful perspective.

Apatosaurus and Diplodocus

Females of the Apatosaurus and Diplodocus species have an interconnected caudal vertebrate that allows them to keep their tails elevated to aid in copulation. Discovering that this fusion occurred in only 50% of the Apatosaurus and Diplodocus skeletons and 25% of the Camarasaurus skeletons, indicated that this is a sexually dimorphic trait.[2]

Theropoda

Male theropods contain a retractable penis, a feature similar to the modern day crocodile. Crocodilian skeletons were examined to determine whether there is a skeletal component that is distinctive in both genders, hence, providing an insight on the physical disparities between male and female theropods. Findings revealed that male crocodiles consisting of the caudal chevron, used to anchor the penis muscles, had significantly larger than the female chevron.[2] There are criticisms that disapprove this discovery, but it remains a subject of debate among advocates and adversaries.

Ornithopoda

Studies of sexual dimorphism in hadrosaurs have generally centred on the distinctive cranial crests of the Hadrosauridae, which would provide a fantastic signal for sexual display. A biometric study of 36 skulls showed sexual dimorphism in the crest of 3 species of hadrosauria. The crests were categorized as full (male) or narrow (female) and may have given some advantage in intrasexual mating-competition.[2]

Ceratopsians

According to Scott D. Sampson, if ceratopsids were to have sexual dimorphism modern ecological analogues suggest it would be in their mating signals like horns and frills.[3] No convincing evidence for sexual dimorphism in body size or mating signals is known in ceratopsids, although was present in the more primitive ceratopsian Protoceratops andrewsi whose sexes were distinguishable based on frill and nasal prominence size.[3] This is consistent with other known tetrapod groups where midsized animals tended to exhibit markedly more sexual dimorphism than larger ones.[4] However, if there were sexually dimorphic traits they may have been soft tissue variations like colorations or dewlaps that would not have been preserved as fossils.[4]

Footnotes

  1. 1 2 Brennan 2013.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Barden, Holly. "Sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs: a review of the evidence and approaches" (PDF). APS 402 Dissertation. University of Sheffield. Retrieved 13 August 2013.
  3. 1 2 Sampson (2001). "Sexual Dimorphism". p. 269.
  4. 1 2 Sampson (2001). "Sexual Dimorphism". p. 270.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/5/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.