String graph

In graph theory, a string graph is an intersection graph of curves in the plane; each curve is called a "string". Given a graph G, G is a string graph if and only if there exists a set of curves, or strings, drawn in the plane such that no three strings intersect at a single point and such that the graph having a vertex for each curve and an edge for each intersecting pair of curves is isomorphic to G.

Background

Seymour Benzer (1959) described a concept similar to string graphs as they applied to genetic structures. In that context, he also posed the specific case of intersecting intervals on a line, namely the now classical family of interval graphs. Later, Sinden (1966) specified the same idea to electrical networks and printed circuits. The mathematical study of string graphs began with the paper Ehrlich, Even & Tarjan (1976) and through a collaboration between Sinden and Ronald Graham, where the characterization of string graphs eventually came to be posed as an open question at the 5th Hungarian Colloquium on Combinatorics in 1976.[1] However, the recognition of string graphs was eventually proven to be NP-complete, implying that no simple characterization is likely to exist.[2]

Related graph classes

Representation of a planar graph as a string graph.

Every planar graph is a string graph:[3] one may form a string graph representation of an arbitrary plane-embedded graph by drawing a string for each vertex that loops around the vertex and around the midpoint of each adjacent edge, as shown in the figure. For any edge uv of the graph, the strings for u and v cross each other twice near the midpoint of uv, and there are no other crossings, so the pairs of strings that cross represent exactly the adjacent pairs of vertices of the original planar graph. Alternatively, by the circle packing theorem, any planar graph may be represented as a collection of circles, any two of which cross if and only if the corresponding vertices are adjacent; these circles (with a starting and ending point chosen to turn them into open curves) provide a string graph representation of the given planar graph. Chalopin, Gonçalves & Ochem (2007) proved that every planar graph has a string representation in which each pair of strings has at most one crossing point, unlike the representations described above. Scheinerman's conjecture, now proven, is the even stronger statement that every planar graph may be represented by the intersection graph of straight line segments, a very special case of strings.

A subdivision of K5 that is not a string graph.

If every edge of a given graph G is subdivided, the resulting graph is a string graph if and only if G is planar. In particular, the subdivision of the complete graph K5 shown in the illustration is not a string graph, because K5 is not planar.[3]

Every circle graph, as an intersection graph of line segments (the chords of a circle), is also a string graph. Every chordal graph may be represented as a string graph: chordal graphs are intersection graphs of subtrees of trees, and one may form a string representation of a chordal graph by forming a planar embedding of the corresponding tree and replacing each subtree by a string that traces around the subtree's edges.

The complement graph of every comparability graph is also a string graph.[4]

Other results

Ehrlich, Even & Tarjan (1976) showed computing the chromatic number of string graphs to be NP-hard. Kratochvil (1991a) found that string graphs form an induced minor closed class, but not a minor closed class of graphs.

Every m-edge string graph can be partitioned into two subsets, each a constant fraction the size of the whole graph, by the removal of O(m3/4log1/2m) edges. It follows that the biclique-free string graphs, string graphs containing no Kt,t subgraph for some constant t, have O(n) edges and more strongly have polynomial expansion.[5]

Notes

  1. ↑ Graham (1976).
  2. ↑ Kratochvil (1991b) showed string graph recognition to be NP-hard, but was not able to show that it could be solved in NP. After intermediate results by Schaefer & Štefankovič (2001) and Pach & Tóth (2002), Schaefer, Sedgwick & Štefankovič (2003) completed the proof that the problem is NP-complete.
  3. 1 2 Schaefer & Štefankovič (2001) credit this observation to Sinden (1966).
  4. ↑ Golumbic, Rotem & Urrutia (1983) and Lovász (1983). See also Fox & Pach (2009).
  5. ↑ Fox & Pach (2009); Dvořák & Norin (2015).

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/28/2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.