Supreme Court of Cassation (Italy)

The Palace of Justice, Rome (Italian: Palazzo di Giustizia), so-called Palazzaccio, in Rome, seat of the Court.

The Supreme Court of Cassation (Italian: Corte Suprema di Cassazione) is the highest court of appeal or court of last resort in Italy. It has its seat in the Palace of Justice, Rome.

The Court of Cassation also ensures the correct application of law in the inferior and appeal courts and resolves disputes as to which lower court (penal, civil, administrative, military) has jurisdiction to hear a given case.

Procedure

The Italian Supreme Court of Cassation is the highest court of Italy. Appeals to the Court of Cassation generally come from the Appellate Court, the second instance courts, but defendants or prosecutors may also appeal directly from trial courts, first instance courts. The Supreme Court can reject, or confirm, a sentence from a lower court. If it rejects the sentence, it can order the lower court to amend the trial and sentencing, or it can annul the previous sentence altogether. A sentence confirmed by the Supreme Court of Cassation is final and definitive, and cannot be further appealed. Although the Supreme Court of Cassation cannot overrule the trial court's interpretation of the evidence it can correct a lower court's interpretation or application of the law connected to a specific case.^[1]

The Italian judicial system is based on Civil law within the framework of late Roman law, and not based on Common Law. Its core principles are entirely codified into a normative system which serves as the primary source of law, which means judicial decisions of the supreme court, as well as those of lower courts, are binding within the frame of reference of each individual case submitted, but do not constitute the base for judicial precedent for other future cases as in Common Law. It is worth noting that while in Civil Law jurisdictions the doctrine of stare decisis (precedent) does not apply, however, in practice the decisions of the Supreme Court of Cassation usually provide a very robust reference point in jurisprudence constante. The two essential aims of the Supreme Court of Cassation are to ensure that lower courts correctly follow legal procedure, and to harmonize the interpretation of laws throughout the judicial system.

Members and organization

The Supreme Court of Cassation is organized into two divisions: a criminal section and a civil section. The court has a general president, The First President of the Court of Cassation, a deputy, and each section has its own president. Cases brought to the supreme court are normally heard by a panel of five judges. In more complex cases, especially those concerning compounded matters of statutory interpretation an extended panel of nine judges ("united sections" of the supreme court) hear the case.^[2][3] In addition, in every case submitted to the supreme court, the office of public prosecutor must state their interpretation of the applicable law, to assist and facilitate the court, in a consultative capacity, in reaching its final decision.^[4][5]

Brief history

The need for this kind of court in Europe became apparent with the Ancien Régime's difficulties in maintaining both uniformity of interpretation and supremacy of the central laws against local privileges and rights. This kind of court first appeared during the French Revolution. The original French courts were initially much more like a legislative body than a judicial one. During his conquests, Napoleon greatly influenced Italian legal theory, and the Court of Cassation was formed using many imported French ideas.

The Court of Cassation was provided by the former Italian Civil Code in 1865 and then it was reorganized by royal decree 12 on 30 January 1941,^[1] supplanting the previous court.^[6]

See also

• Court of cassation (for other courts of cassation around the world)

References

1. G. Di Federico, La Corte di cassazione: la giustizia come organizzazione, Laterza Editore, 1969.
2. P. Calamandrei, Istituzioni di diritto processuale civile, Padova, 1943
3. G. Leone, Lineamenti di diritto processuale penale italiano, Giuffre Editore, 1956
4. S. Satta, Diritto processuale civile, CEDAM, Padova, 1959
5. V. Lacoppola, La competenza civile nella giurisprudenza della cassazione, Milano, 1988.
6. The Court of Appeal judges, during the fascism, sometimes escaped the rigors of the dictates of the local Fascist boss by judgments condemning with contradictory motivations, so as to achieve by the Supreme Court "liberal" absolution for inadequacy of motivation: Buonomo, Giampiero (2003). "Il progetto di riforma dell'ordinamento giudiziario e le "sentenze suicide"". Forum di Quaderni costituzionali.  – via Questia (subscription required)

External links

• Corte di Cassazione
• Unofficial search engine of new cases from Corte di Cassazione