Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Argued March 30, 2011
Decided June 9, 2011
Full case name Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. DBA AT&T Michigan
Docket nos. 10-313
Citations

564 U.S. 50 (more)

Argument Oral argument
Opinion announcement Opinion announcement
Prior history Michigan Public Service Commission decision reversed sub nom. Mich. Bell Tel. Co. v. Lark, 2007 WL 2868633 (E.D. Mich. 2007); affirmed sub nom. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Covad Communications Co., 597 F.3d 370 (6th Cir. 2010); certiorari granted, 562 U.S. 1104 (2010)
Holding
The Federal Communications Commission had advanced a reasonable interpretation of its regulations in a dispute with AT&T.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John G. Roberts
Case opinions
Majority Thomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor
Concurrence Scalia
Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 564 U.S. 50 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had advanced a reasonable interpretation of its regulations in a dispute with AT&T.[1]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. Syllabus p. 2 "Held: The FCC has advanced a reasonable interpretation of its regulations—i.e., that to satisfy its duty under §251(c)(2), an incumbent LEC must make its existing entrance facilities available to competitors at cost-based rates if the facilities are to be used for interconnection—and this Court defers to the FCC’s views."

External links


This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/4/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.