Thymic involution

One of the major characteristics of vertebrate immunology is thymic involution, the shrinking of the thymus with age, resulting in changes in the architecture of the thymus and a decrease in tissue mass.[1] This process is a conserved sequence or (orthologous sequences) in almost all vertebrates, from birds, teleosts, amphibians to reptiles, though the thymi of a few species of sharks are known not to involute.[1][2] T-cells are named for the thymus where T-lymphocytes migrate from the bone marrow to mature. Its regression has been linked to the reduction in immunosurveillance in the elderly.[3] Though thymic involution has been linked to senescence, it is not induced by senescence as the organ starts involuting from a young age [4] – as early as the first year of life in humans.[5]

Development of the Thymus

Neonatal Development

Though the thymus is fully developed before birth,[6] newborns have an essentially empty peripheral immune compartment immediately after birth.[7][8] Hence, T lymphocytes are not present in the peripheral lymphoid tissues, where naïve, mature lymphocytes are stimulated to respond to pathogens.[1] In order to populate the peripheral system, the thymus increases in size and upregulates its function during the early neonatal period.[1]

Age-related Involution

Though some sources continue to cite puberty as the time of onset, studies have shown thymic involution to start much earlier.[1] The crucial distinction came from the observation that the thymus consists of two main components: the true thymic epithelial space (TES) and the perivascular space (PVS).[5] Thymopoiesis, or T-cell maturation, only occurs in the former. In humans, the TES starts decreasing from the first year of life at a rate of 3% until middle age (35–45 years of age), whereupon it decreases at a rate of 1% until death.[5] Hypothetically, the thymus should stop functioning at around 105 years of age;[9] but, studies with bone-transplant patients have shown that the thymi of the majority of patients over forty were unable to build a naïve T cell compartment.[10]

Effects of the involution

The ability of the immune system to mount a strong protective response depends on the receptor diversity of naive T-cells (TCR). Thymic involution results in a decreased output of naïve T lymphocytes – mature T cells that are tolerant to self antigens, responsive to foreign antigens, but have not yet been stimulated by a foreign substance. In adults, naïve T-cells are hypothesized to be primarily maintained through homeostatic proliferation, or cell division of existing naïve T cells. Though homeostatic proliferation helps sustain TCR even with minimal to nearly absent thymic activity, it does not increase the receptor diversity.[11] For yet unknown reasons, TCR diversity drops drastically around age 65.[11] Loss of thymic function and TCR diversity is thought to contribute to weaker immunosurveillance of the elderly, including increasing instances of diseases such as cancers, autoimmunity, and opportunistic infections.[12]

Acute thymic involution and treatment implications

There is growing evidence that thymic involution is plastic and can be therapeutically halted or reversed in order to help boost the immune system. In fact, under certain circumstances, the thymus has been shown to undergo acute thymic involution (alternatively called transient involution).[1] For example, transient involution has been induced in humans and other animals by stresses [13] such as infections,[14][15] pregnancy,[16] and malnutrition.[15][17][18] The thymus has also been shown to decrease during hibernation and, in frogs, change in size depending on the season, growing smaller in the winter [19] Studies on acute thymic involution may help in developing treatments for patients, who for example are unable to restore immune function after chemotherapy, ionizing radiation, or infections like HIV.[12]

Evolutionary Mystery

Thymic involution remains an evolutionary mystery since it occurs in most vertebrates despite its negative effects. Since it is not induced by senescence, many scientists have hypothesized that there may have been evolutionary pressures for the organ to involute. A few hypotheses are as follows: Developing T cells that interact strongly with antigen being presented within the thymus are induced to undergo programmed cell death. The intended effect is deletion of self-reactive T cells. This works well when the antigen being presented within the thymus is truly of self origin, but antigen from pathogenic microbes that happens to infiltrate the thymus has the potential to subvert the entire process. Rather than deleting T cells that would cause autoimmunity, T cells capable of eliminating the infiltrating pathogen are deleted instead. It has been proposed that one way to minimize this problem is to produce as many long-lived T cells as possible during the time of life when the thymus is most likely to be pristine, which generally would be when organisms are very young and under the protection of a functional maternal immune system.[20] Thus, in mice and humans, for example, the best time to have a prodigiously functional thymus is prior to birth. In turn, it is well known from Williams'[21] theory of the evolution of senescence that strong selection for enhanced early function readily accommodates, through antagonistic pleiotropy, deleterious later occurring effects, thus potentially accounting for the especially early demise of the thymus. The disposable soma hypothesis and life history hypothesis say similarly that tradeoffs are involved in thymic involution. Since the immune system must compete with other bodily systems, notably reproduction, for limited physiological resources, the body must invest in the immune system differentially at different stages of life. There is high immunological investment in youth since immunological memory is low.[1] There are also hypotheses that suggest that thymic involution is directly adaptive. For example, some hypotheses have proposed that thymic involution may help in avoidance of autoimmunity or other dangers,[22] prevention of infection,[9] and production of an optimal repertoire of T-cells.[23] Zinc deficiency may also play a role[24]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Shanley D.P.; Danielle A.W.; Manley N.R.; Palmer D.B.; et al. (2009). "An evolutionary perspective on the mechanisms of immunosenescence". Trends Immunol. 30 (7): 374–381. doi:10.1016/j.it.2009.05.001. PMID 19541538.
  2. Zakharova L.A. (2009). "Evolution of adaptive immunity". Seriya Biologicheskaya. 2: 143–154.
  3. Linton P.J.; Dorshkind K. (2004). "Age-related changes in lymphocyte development and function". Nat. Immunol. 5 (2): 133–139. doi:10.1038/ni1033. PMID 14749784.
  4. Taub D.D.; Long D.L. (2005). "Insights into thymic aging and regeneration". Immunol. Reviews. 205: 72–93. doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00275.x.
  5. 1 2 3 Steinmann G.G.; Klaus B.; Muller-Hermelin H.K.; et al. (1985). "The involution of the aging human thymic epithelium is independent of puberty. A morphometric study". Scand. J. Immunol. 22 (5): 563–75. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3083.1985.tb01916.x. PMID 4081647.
  6. Parham, P. 2005. The immune system: Second edition Garland Science.
  7. Min B.; McHugh R.; Sempowski G.D.; Mackall C.; Foucras G.; Paul W.E.; et al. (2003). "Neonates support lymphopenia-induced proliferation". Immunity. 18 (1): 131–140. doi:10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00508-3. PMID 12530982.
  8. Schuler T.; Hammerling G.J.; Arnold B.; et al. (2004). "Cutting edge: IL-7-dependent homeostatic proliferation of CD8+ T cells in neonatal mice allows the generation of long-lived natural memory T cells". J. Immunol. 172 (1): 15–19. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.1.15. PMID 14688303.
  9. 1 2 George A.J.; Ritter M.A. (1996). "Thymic involution with ageing: obsolescence or good housekeeping?". Immunol. Today. 17 (6): 267–272. doi:10.1016/0167-5699(96)80543-3. PMID 8962629.
  10. Hakim F.; Memon S.; Cepeda R.; Jones E.; Chow C.; Kasten-Sportes C.; Odom J.; Vance B.; Christensen B.; et al. (2005). "Age-dependent incidence, time course, and consequences of thymic renewal in adults". J. Clin. Invest. 115 (4): 930–939. doi:10.1172/JCI22492. PMC 1064981Freely accessible. PMID 15776111.
  11. 1 2 Naylor K.; Li G.; Vallejo A.N.; Lee W.W.; Koetz K.; Bryl E.; Witkowski J.; Fulbright J.; Weyand C.M.; et al. (2005). "The influence of age on T cell generation and TCR diversity". J. Immunol. 174 (11): 7446–7452. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.7446. PMID 15905594.
  12. 1 2 Lynch H.E.; Goldberg G.L.; Chidgey A.; Boyd R.; Sempowski G.D.; et al. (2009). "Thymic involution and immune reconstitution". Trends in Immunol. 30 (7): 366–373. doi:10.1016/j.it.2009.04.003.
  13. Dominguez-Gerpe L, Rey-Mendez M (2003). "Evolution of the Thymus Size in Response to Physiological and Random Events Throughout Life". Microscopy Research and Technique. 62 (6): 464–476. doi:10.1002/jemt.10408. PMID 14635139.
  14. Savino W (2006). "The thymus is a common target organ in infectious diseases". PLOS Pathogens. 2 (6): 472–483. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.0020062. PMC 1483230Freely accessible. PMID 16846255.
  15. 1 2 Savino, W., M. Dardenne, L.A. Velloso, and S.D. Silva-Barbosa. 2007. The thymus is a common target in malnutrition and infection. Brit. J. of Nutr. 98: S11-S16.
  16. Kendall M.D.; Clarke A.G. (2000). "The thymus in the mouse changes its activity during pregnancy: a study of the microenvironment". J. Anat. 197 (3): 393–411. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19730393.x. PMC 1468141Freely accessible. PMID 11117626.
  17. Cromi A.; Ghezzi F.; Raffaelli R.; Bergamini V.; Siesto G.; Bolis P.; et al. (2009). "Ultrasonographic measurement of thymus size in IUGR fetuses: a marker of the fetal immunoendocrine response to malnutrition". Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 33: 421–426. doi:10.1002/uog.6320.
  18. Howard J.K.; Lord G.M.; Matarese G.; Vendetti S.; Ghatei M.A.; Ritter M.A.; Lechler R.I.; Bloom S.R.; et al. (1999). "Leptin protects mice from starvation induced lymphoid atrophy and increases thymic cellularity in ob/ob mice". J. Clin. Invest. 104 (8): 1051–1059. doi:10.1172/JCI6762. PMC 408574Freely accessible. PMID 10525043.
  19. Wytycz, B., Mica, J., Jozkowir, A. & Bigaj J. 1996. Letters: Plasticity of thymuses of ectothermic vertebrates. Immunology Today (Comment). 442: No.9.
  20. Turke P (1995). "Microbial parasites versus developing T cells: an evolutionary arms race with implications for the timing of thymic involution and HIV pathenogenesis". Thymus. 24 (1): 29–40. PMID 8629277.
  21. Williams G. C. (1957). "Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence". Evolution. 11 (4): 398–411. doi:10.2307/2406060.
  22. Aronson M (1991). "Hypothesis: involution of the thymus with aging–programmed and beneficial". Thymus. 18 (1): 7–13. PMID 1926291.
  23. Dowling M.R.; Hodgkin P.D. (2009). "Why does the thymus involute? A selection-based hypothesis". Trends Immunol. 30 (7): 295–300. doi:10.1016/j.it.2009.04.006. PMID 19540805.
  24. Mocchegiani E, Muzzioli M, Cipriano C, Giacconi R (1998). "Zinc, T-cell pathways, aging: role of metallothioneins". Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 106 (1–2): 183–204. doi:10.1016/S0047-6374(98)00115-8. PMID 9883983.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.