United States Senate elections, 1908 and 1909
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The United States Senate elections of 1908 and 1909, some states elected their Senators directly even before passage of the 17th Amendment in 1913. Oregon pioneered direct election and experimented with different measures over several years until it succeeded in 1907. Soon after, Nebraska followed suit and laid the foundation for other states to adopt measures reflecting the people's will. By 1912, as many as 29 states elected senators either as nominees of their party's primary or in conjunction with a general election. The Republicans lost one seat to the Democrats.
Results summary
Senate Party Division, 61st Congress (1909–1911)
- Majority Party: Republican (60 seats)
- Minority Party: Democratic (32 seats)
- Other Parties: 0
- Total Seats: 92
Change in Senate composition
|
|
Key: |
|
|
---|
Race summaries
Special elections during the 60th Congress
In this election, the winner was seated during in 1908 before March 4; ordered by state.
State | Incumbent | Results | Candidates | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Senator | Party | Electoral history | |||
Rhode Island | Vacant | Legislature had failed to elect. New senator elected January 22, 1908. Republican gain. |
√ Martin N. Johnson (Republican) [Data unknown/missing. You can help!] |
Races leading to the 61st Congress
In these general elections, the winners were elected for the term beginning March 4, 1909; ordered by state.
All of the elections involved the Class 3 seats.
State | Incumbent | Results | Candidates | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Senator | Party | Electoral history | |||
California | George Perkins | Republican | 1895 (Special) 1897 1903 |
Incumbent re-elected January 12, 1909.[1] | √ George Perkins (Republican) 88 votes Unknown 40 votes.[1] |
Colorado | Henry M. Teller | Democratic | 1885 1891 1897 1903 |
Incumbent retired. New senator elected in 1909.[2] Democratic hold. |
√ Charles J. Hughes Jr. (Democratic) [Data unknown/missing. You can help!] |
Florida | William Milton | Democratic | 1908 (Appointed) | Interim appointee retired. Legislature failed to elect. Democratic loss. New senator appointed to start the term, and subsequently elected, see below. |
None |
Louisiana | Samuel D. McEnery | Democratic | 1896 1900 (Early) |
Incumbent re-elected May 19, 1908.[3] | √ Samuel D. McEnery (Democratic) Unopposed |
New Hampshire | Jacob Gallinger | Republican | 1891 1897 1903 |
Incumbent re-elected in 1909.[2] | √ Jacob Gallinger (New Hampshire)258 votes Oliver E. Branch (Democratic) 108 votes[2] |
North Dakota | Henry C. Hansbrough | Republican | 1891 1897 1903 |
Incumbent lost re-election. New senator elected in 1908 or 1909. Republican hold. |
√ Martin N. Johnson (Republican) [Data unknown/missing. You can help!] |
Connecticut, Missouri, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, Iowa, North Carolina, Utah, and Washington all elected in 1909.[2]
Illinois elected January 19, 1909.[4]
New York elected January 19, 1909.[5]
Oregon elected January 19, 1909.[6]
Elections during the 61st Congress
In these elections, the winners were elected in 1909 after March 4; ordered by date.
State | Incumbent | Results | Candidates | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Senator | Party | Electoral history | |||
Florida (Class 3) |
Duncan U. Fletcher | Democratic | 1909 (Appointed) | Interim appointee elected April 20, 1909 to finish the term. | √ Duncan U. Fletcher (Democratic) [Data unknown/missing. You can help!] |
See also
Notes
- 1 2 "Perkins of California Re-elected.". The New York Times. January 13, 1903. p. 5.
- 1 2 3 4 "ELECTIONS IN OTHER STATES". The New York Times. January 20, 1909. p. 3.
- ↑ "Senator McEnery Succeeds Himself.". The New York Times. May 20, 1900. p. 2.
- ↑ "HOPKINS FAILS IN ILLINOIS.". The New York Times. January 20, 1909. p. 3.
- ↑ "ROOT IS CHOSEN SENATOR.". The New York Times. January 20, 1909. p. 3.
- ↑ "NAME CHAMBERLAIN AS OREGON SENATOR". The New York Times. January 20, 1909. p. 3.
References
- Party Division in the Senate, 1789-Present, via Senate.gov