United States v. Davila
United States v. Davila | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued April 15, 2013 Decided June 13, 2013 | |||||||
Full case name | United States, Petitioner v. Anthony Davila | ||||||
Docket nos. | 12-167 | ||||||
Citations | |||||||
Argument | Oral argument | ||||||
Prior history | On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | ||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan | ||||||
Concurrence | Scalia, joined by Thomas |
United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. ___ (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a federal judge participates in the plea process in violation of rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a guilty plea need not be vacated if the record shows prejudice to the decision to plea due to rule 11(h).[1]
Notes
References
- United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (December 2011). "United States v. Davila" (PDF).
- Supreme Court of the United States (August 2012). "Docket for United States v. Davila".
- United States Department of Justice (December 2012). "Reply Brief for United States v. Davila" (PDF).
- American Bar Association (March 2013). "Amicus Brief for United States v. Davila" (PDF).
- Supreme Court of the United States (June 2013). "United States v. Davila" (PDF).
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.