2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor

The 2010 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 4, 2010 and concluded October 1, 2011. This was the second term of Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor's tenure on the Court .
Sonia Sotomayor 2010 term statistics
7
Majority or Plurality
8
Concurrence
1
Other
9
Dissent
0
Concurrence/dissent Total = 25
Bench opinions = 22 Opinions relating to orders = 3 In-chambers opinions = 0
Unanimous opinions: 2 Most joined by: Breyer (13) Least joined by: Thomas (3)
Type Case Citation Issues Joined by Other opinions
1-01



Chase Bank USA, N. A. v. McCoy 562 U.S. 195 (2011)

Truth in Lending Act   Regulation Z   credit card issuer change-in-terms notice requirements Unanimous
4-02



Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC 562 U.S. 223 (2011)

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986   state law design defect claims   federal preemption Ginsburg
Scalia
Breyer
2-03



Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. 562 U.S. 323 (2011)

National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966   Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards on seat belt design   state law torts against auto manufacturers   federal preemption
Breyer
Thomas
1-04



Michigan v. Bryant 562 U.S. 344 (2011)

Sixth Amendment   Confrontation Clause   hearsay exception for statements to help police address ongoing emergency Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito
Thomas
Scalia
Ginsburg
1-05



Pepper v. United States 562 U.S. 476 (2011)

Federal Sentencing Guidelines   consideration of postsentencing rehabilitation Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg; Breyer, Alito (in part)
Breyer
Alito
Thomas
4-06



Pitre v. Cain  [full text] 562 U.S. 992 (2010)

Eight Amendment   prison conditions   right to refuse medical treatment
Sotomayor dissented from the Court's denial of certiorari. She believed that the lower courts erred in dismissing a prison inmate's complaint, which alleged that, as punishment for his refusal to take his HIV medication as a protest against his transfer to a prison facility, prison officials subjected him to hard labor in extreme heat that posed a serious risk to his health. Sotomayor argued that the inmate stated an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference, and that it was incorrect for the lower court to dismiss his complaint for his failure to submit evidence in support prior to a responsive pleading being submitted.
5-07



Gamache v. California  [full text] 562 U.S. 1083 (2010)

harmless error   burden of proof Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan
Sotomayor filed a statement respecting the Court's denial of certiorari. Prior to rendering a guilty verdict and death sentence, a jury had been given access to a damaging video tape depicting the defendant that had not been admitted into evidence. The California Supreme Court, stating that the defendant had the burden of proving prejudice, determined that the introduction of the tape was harmless error. Sotomayor wrote to correct the court's error of law, noting that under Supreme Court precedent the burden is instead upon the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a constitutional trial error was harmless. She believed, however, that based on the evidence and the court's analysis, the outcome would have been the same in this case regardless of how the burden was allocated, and so did not disagree with the denial of certiorari.
4-08



Williams v. Hobbs  [full text] 562 U.S. 1097 (2010)

habeas corpus   evidentiary hearings   preservation of issues on appeal Ginsburg
Sotomayor dissented from the Court's denial of certiorari of a judgment reversing the granting of a habeas petition after an evidentiary hearing. The petitioner had been convicted of murder in state court and sentenced to death after his attorneys conceded his guilt at trial and failed to present any substantive mitigating evidence at sentencing. In District Court, he established that his counsel was ineffective and at the evidentiary hearing to establish prejudice, presented evidence of his childhood of abuse and neglect. In reversing the District Court's granting of the petition, the Eighth Circuit claimed that the State had preserved its objection to the evidentiary hearing, when in Sotomayor's view it not only made no clear objection but in fact, "voluntarily participate[d]...without objection, with an apparent intent of supplementing the record for its own purposes, and at a significant cost and expenditure of judicial resources." "Today", she wrote, "the Court refuses to review the Eighth Circuit's conclusion that a State may withhold an objection to a federal habeas evidentiary hearing until after the hearing is complete, the constitutional violation established, and habeas relief granted. Because I believe such a rule enables, and even invites, States to manipulate federal habeas proceedings to their own strategic advantage at an unacceptable cost to justice, I respectfully dissent."
1-09



Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano 563 U.S. 27 (2011)

Securities Exchange Act of 1934   Rule 10b-5   failure of pharmaceutical company to disclose evidence of drug side effect   materiality Unanimous
4-10



Cullen v. Pinholster 563 U.S. 170 (2011)

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996   introduction of new evidence in habeas corpus proceedings   Sixth Amendment   ineffective assistance of counsel Ginsburg, Kagan (in part)
Thomas
Alito
Breyer
4-11



Sossamon v. Texas 563 U.S. 277 (2011)

prisoners' rights   Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act   Spending Clause   sovereign immunity Breyer
Thomas
2-12



United States v. Tohono O'odham Nation 563 U.S. 307 (2011)

Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction   separate suits based on same operative facts Breyer
Kennedy
Ginsburg
4-13



Chamber of Commerce of United States of America v. Whiting 563 U.S. 582 (2011)

Immigration Reform and Control Act   Legal Arizona Workers Act   state requirement that businesses use E-Verify   suspension or revocation of business licenses for hiring unauthorized aliens   federal preemption
Roberts
Breyer
2-14



Camreta v. Greene 563 U.S. 692 (2011)

Article III   Case or Controversy Clause   standing   review of constitutional issue on appeal from defendant with qualified immunity   mootness Breyer
Kagan
Scalia
Kennedy
2-15



Ashcroft v. al-Kidd 563 U.S. 731 (2011)

material witness arrest of terrorism suspects   pretextual motivation   Fourth Amendment   qualified immunity Ginsburg, Breyer
Scalia
Kennedy
Ginsburg
2-16



Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. 563 U.S. 776 (2011)

patent law   University and Small Business Patent Procedures Act of 1980   vesting of federally funded patents in inventors or contractors
Roberts
Breyer
1-17



DePierre v. United States 564 U.S. 70 (2011)

Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986   sentence enhancement for "cocaine base" Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan; Scalia (in part)
Scalia
1-18



Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership 564 U.S. 91 (2011)

Patent Act of 1952   presumption of patent validity   on-sale bar   clear and convincing evidence Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan
Thomas
Breyer
4-19



United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation 564 U.S. 162 (2011)

fiduciary exception to attorney–client privilege   general trust relationship between the United States and Indian tribes
Alito
Ginsburg
2-20



Davis v. United States 564 U.S. 229 (2011)

Fourth Amendment   exclusionary rule   good faith reliance on binding appellate precedent
Alito
Breyer
1-21



J. D. B. v. North Carolina 564 U.S. 261 (2011)

Fifth Amendment   Miranda warning   effect of minor's age on determining custodial status Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan
Alito
2-22



Tapia v. United States 564 U.S. 319 (2011)

extension of prison sentence to foster rehabilitation Alito
Kagan
2-23



Freeman v. United States 564 U.S. 522 (2011)

Sentencing Reform Act of 1984   sentence reduction due to retroactive amendment of Sentencing Guidelines   plea bargain under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11
Kennedy
Roberts
4-24



PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing 564 U.S. 604 (2011)

federal generic drug labeling requirements   federal preemption Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan
Thomas
2-25



Bullcoming v. New Mexico 564 U.S. 647 (2011)

Sixth Amendment   Confrontation Clause   forensic laboratory report as testimony
Ginsburg
Kennedy

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/4/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.