Tafsir al-Tabari

Jāmi‘ al-bayān ‘an ta’wīl āy al-Qur’ān
Author Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari
Original title جامع البيان عن تأويل آي القرآن
Language Arabic
Genre Religious, tafsir

Jāmiʿ al-bayān ʿan taʾwīl āy al-Qurʾān (Arabic: جامع البيان عن تأويل آي القرآن‎, lit. 'Collection of statements on interpretation of verses of the Qur'an'‎), popularly Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī (Arabic: تفسير الطبري‎‎), is a Sunni tafsir by the Persian scholar Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari (838–923).[1] It immediately won high regard and retained its importance for scholars until the present day.[2] It is the earliest major running commentary of the Quran to have survived in its original form.[2] Like his history, al-Tabari's tafsir is notable for its comprehensiveness and citation of multiple, often conflicting sources.[3] The book was translated into Persian by a group of scholars from Transoxania on commission of the Samanid king, Mansur I (961–976).[2]

Background

Tabari finished his work in 883, often dictating sections to his students.[1][4] It is his second great work after "History of the Prophets and Kings" (Tarīkh al-Rusul wa'l-Muluk), also known as "Tarikh al-Tabari".

Sources

Tabari has relied on narratives of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, including narrations and comments of sahabah and tabi'in where necessary. Tabari supplies the chain of narrations for the reports included in the commentary, sometimes elaborating on the trustworthiness of narrators.[1][5] Narratives are selected based on their authenticity; a notable example is the rejection of the same historical sources he had already used for his historical works.

Al-Tabari incorporated an earlier commentary by ‘Abd al-Razzaq b. Hamman al-Himyari al-San‘ani (d. 211/827) in its entirety into his work, and Heribert Horst has argued that Al-Tabari has also used other subsequently lost commentaries.[2]

Preface

In the preface, general facts about the Quran are given, including its superiority to any other text, what tafsir and tawil are, the seven qira'at, companions who commented on the Quran and the naming of the suras.[1][6]

The language of the Quran, Arabic, is discussed and the view that there are foreign words in the Quran is rejected.[1][7] Tabari mentions that these foreign words are coherent with Arabic, entering the Arabic language before the revelation of the Quran, and that they are very rare, and cannot be used as counter evidence that the Quran is Arabic.

Content

Interpretations start with "al-qawlu fī ta'wīli qawlihi ta'ālā" (English: The tawil of this word of God is) for every verse. Then hadith and other previous interpretations are stated and classified according to their compatibility to each other. Interpretation using other verses and Arabic language is favored, qualifying this tafsir as riwaya, but the inclusion of critiques and reason is an integral part of the books unique character; as Tabari has refrained from interpretation using merely his own opinion and opposed those who do so.[1][8]

Lexical meanings of words are given, and their use in Arabic culture is examined. Tabari's linguistic views are based on the school of Basra. Opinions of linguists are given where appropriate. Evidence from Arabic poetry is used frequently, sometimes with its origins.

Tabari is also a qira'at scholar, reflected in his opinions on qira'at debates in his book. Choices of qira'at are usually given according to the Kufa school. Sometimes both qira'at are preserved, leaving the choice to the reader.[1][9]

Although rare, Tabari has included isra'iliyat occasionally in his book. Given only as notice, this information is not dwelled upon, usually left for the understanding of the reader.

Influence

The Tafsir gives information about older commentaries which have not survived to the present. Its content —which encompasses dictionaries, historical notes, law, recitation, theology and Arabic literature— has made it a highly referenced book throughout history, resulting in many editions. It is also a good example of reasoning in a tafsir by a widely accepted scholar, giving it a value of diraya.

It was marked by the same fullness of detail as his other work. The size of this work and the independence of judgment in it seem to have prevented it from having a large circulation, but scholars such as Baghawi and Suyuti used it largely; Ibn Kathir used it in his Tafsir ibn Kathir. Scholars including Suyuti have expressed their admiration towards this tafsir, regarding it as the most valuable of commentaries.[1][10] Until well into the 19th century Al-Tabari's tafsir was considered lost by Western scholars, who knew it only from fragmentary quotations. In 1860 Theodor Nöldeke wrote: "If we had this work, we could do without all the later commentaries."[11]

Translation

Mansur I, a Samanid king who ruled in Khorasan between 961 and 976, asked for the legal opinion (fatwa) of jurists on the permissibility of translating the Quran into Persian. The scholars affirmed that reading and writing the translation of the Quran in Persian was permissible for those who did not speak Arabic. Subsequently, the King ordered a group of scholars from Transoxiana and Khorasan to translate Tafsir al-Tabari into Persian. The Persian translation of the tafsir has survived and has been published numerous times in Iran.

Editions

Editions of Tabari's commentary on the Qur'an:

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 İsmail Cerrahoğlu (1993) Diyanet İslam Ansiklopedisi, "CÂMİU’l-BEYÂN an TE’VÎLİ ÂYİ’l-KUR’ÂN" (In Turkish)
  2. 1 2 3 4 C.E. Bosworth. Encyclopedia of Islam 2nd ed, Brill. "Al-Tabari, Abu Djafar Muhammad b. Djarir b. Yazid", Vol. 10, p. 14.
  3. ↑ Elton L. Daniel. "ṬABARI, ABU JAʿFAR MOḤAMMAD B. JARIR". Encyclopaedia Iranica.
  4. ↑ Yaqut al-Hamawi, Mu'jam al-udabā', XVIII, 62
  5. ↑ Tafsir al-Tabari, I, 33
  6. ↑ Tafsir al-Tabari, I, 32
  7. ↑ Al-Khatib al-Baghdadi, Ta'rikh Baghdad, II, 164; Yaqut al-Hamawi, Mu'jam al-udabā', XVIII, 42
  8. ↑ Abu Dawood, "İlm", 5; Tirmidhi, "Tafsir",1
  9. ↑ Tafsir al-Tabari, IV, 328-329; VIII, 351
  10. ↑ Inbah al-ruwat (Al-Qifti), III, 89; al-Itqan (Al-Suyuti), IV, 21 2 ; Ahmed Muhammed el-Hûfî, et-Taberî, Kahire 1390/1970, s. 157
  11. ↑ "Hätten wir dies Werk [...] so könnten wir alle späteren Kommentare entbehren." Quoted in Ignác Goldziher, Die Richtungen der islamischen Koranauslegung, 1920. pp. 86-87
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/3/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.